San Diego State at Notre Dame: The Aftermath
This is the first look at the
I think the most important thing to take from yesterday’s game is that while Notre Dame, for the most part, played really, really poorly, made a ton of stupid mistakes and looked generally anemic on offense, they won. Yes,
We’ll start with the defense, which I think played pretty well yesterday, although it’s become glaringly apparent there will not be any pressure on the quarterback this season without the aid of a blitz. As far as linebackers go, the veterans who we assumed wouldn't contribute didn't and the young guys who have been impressive impressed. Despite a couple slip-ups, I think the addition of Sergio Brown to the Bruton/McCarthy defensive back tandem will produce some needed turnovers for the Irish.
Kudos to Chuck Long, Ryan Lindley and a patched together offensive line for not being flustered by the Tenuta blitzes, calmly finding hot routes and utilizing the shovel pass to escape (save for Neal’s fantastic interception). The Irish will probably be blitzing a lot and freeing up these quick hitters this season, so the tacklers on the second and third levels will have to be wrapping up and denying the slot receivers and tailbacks’ bids to turn those quick dump offs into big plays. Lindley is a red-shirt freshman, playing in his second game, on the road, in a big-time environment I can’t imagine he’s seen before, and he handled himself quite adequately.
His Irish counterpart, Jimmy Clausen, also played a solid game for the opener, and if he’d only cut his hair, I think most Irish fans could embrace him. I guess the first interception was his fault, as it is sort of a dick move to throw a pass that hits a guy squarely in the numbers, but I suppose we could place the blame for the second one on Kamara, the play call and Clausen, as it was a perfect storm of horrendous offense in the Aztec end zone. Regardless of the talent differential between the two teams or expectations of the final score before it started, the Irish were down going into the fourth with their running backs banged up and had to start throwing. At that point, Clausen stepped up his game the way you want and need your quarterback to in crunch time. It would probably be a benefit to Clausen if the best receivers on the team were permitted to play all the time, but hey, he’s got to earn that right.
The offensive line play left quite a bit to be desired, especially when you project this effort looking at the
A lot of us found it odd that despite being the only offensive player to produce last season (things like yardage, touchdowns, broken tackles, which I think contribute to scoring points, which then helps to win football games) and doing himself no harm in camp, Robert Hughes got a grand total of one carry in the first quarter. Odder still was after being inserted as the primary back in the initial drive of the second quarter, Hughes immediately helped roll the Irish 73 yards down the field. And if you want to turn this into an episode of The X-Files, the eeriness increases when you consider that Golden Tate also got two balls thrown to him on that highly productive, near-touchdown scoring drive.
We could actually make a feature film out of this mystery when you toss in the fact that the one catch Michael Floyd has was for a touchdown, and those at the game testified that he was getting separation the few times he was in the game. Common sense and a rudimentary understanding of how collegiate football works might make you think that running Hughes right and throwing to Tate and Floyd might be the best way for the Irish to score points, but Coach Weis chooses not to do that. You could potentially counter that statement by saying “Well, Weis was saving stuff for Michigan,” at which point my jaw would drop slightly and I’d stare at you for a beat to make sure you weren’t joking before screaming “3-9 TEAMS DON’T SAVE THINGS!”.
As a wise philosopher once said, you play to win the game, and I’m so tired of Weis defenders citing this mystical season-long game plan as an excuse for mind-boggling personnel decisions. Saying that “Well, he’s the coach for a reason,” isn’t a defense either, because he might not be the coach for much longer unless things start improving. “You don’t understand everything going on in the program, at practice, in meetings, etc.” is a more legitimate argument, but unless there’s some huge attitude problem or something of that ilk nobody in the press or the stands picks up on, it’s probably a good idea for the players who perform best in the games to then play more in the games.
This was supposed to be a guaranteed win, and a lot of the other “guarantees” people were tacking onto their 10-2 record predictions after last week are not really sure things. We play at Washington, and as much as we love to make fun of Ty (and trust me, the way their game ended yesterday was hilarious), the Huskies have now come just shy of knocking off Ohio State, Southern Cal and BYU at home in the past two seasons, and those teams are probably a thousand times better than Notre Dame has looked since Our Fair Brady departed. Navy’s offense still has some weapons to go along with their poor defense, and anyone can win a shootout. Stanford, despite falling at
From watching a decent amount of
0 recs |
5 comments
Comments
The Aftermath
I agree that was ugly and a disappointment for those of us expecting big strides.
But while Weis should not be free from scrutiny, you can’t really blame him for fumbles, interceptions, and missed field goals. Sooner or later ND’s young talent needs to step up and execute. With a few less mistakes that game would have been an easy Irish win and all of today’s articles would be focusing on how the off season changes by Weis paid dividends. This is still a very young team—I’ll wait to see how the season plays out before I reach any conclusions about Weis’ future.
by San Diego Irish on Sep 7, 2008 3:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm not reaching any conclusions, just pointing out that. . .
Weis has to make some adjustments. Since Penn State 2006, I don’t think Notre Dame has played a truly great game against quality competition, and that’s an indictment of the whole program. While I’m more than willing to see if Weis can craft all of recruits into a good team this season, after game one, there is still a considerable amount of room for progress.
http://www.rakesofmallow.com
by CW on Sep 7, 2008 4:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
the Aftermath
Agreed—he still has much to prove.
by San Diego Irish on Sep 7, 2008 4:32 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Classic Line
It would probably be a benefit to Clausen if the best receivers on the team were permitted to play all the time, but hey, he’s got to earn that right.
Great review. I agree that an offense that featured #33 running hard over the right side and long passes to #23 and #3 would be worth trying.
by OCDomer on Sep 7, 2008 6:34 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Finding a Rhythm
Many fans are banging on the play selection of the Irish which is understandable, since we all expected the running game to go much better. I think the most disappointing aspect is that the coaches went away from things that were working. If the running game gives you third and short, don’t automatically pass it on third down. Try running it one more down. On the other hand, I don’t care if Weis lived up to his “smash mouth” talk or if they throw it more, because in this day and age you have to do both or it will come back to bite you. Haywood needs to learn from this, and spread the ball around, giving it to the guys who can make plays. It doesn’t matter how he does it.
-from adamn at www.southbendblarney.com
by adam nico on Sep 7, 2008 9:49 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 










